World Water SKIING #april 1983 (USA)

Posted by | Posted in INFOS, PRESSE | Posted on 07-09-2013

skiingjaws3leaPourquoi www.jaws-3d.com peut-il prétendre à la médaille d’or des sites internet consacrés à Jaws 3D (en dehors du fait qu’il soit le seul dans sa catégorie) ? Parce que je ne recule devant rien pour vous ramener des documents rares! Fouiller pendant des heures dans des tonnes de magazines de ski nautique (saison 82-83) à  la recherche d’ une simple évocation de votre film préféré? C’est fait! Bilan de la pêche un peu terne mais quelques lignes sur la jolie Lea Thompson (Kelly-Ann Bukowski) quand même. Et en plus, vous allez obtenir des informations inédites sur le tournage de la pyramide qui s’effondre! Décidemment, on pourra pas m’accuser de faire les choses à moitié… Et puis si malgré tout les informations concernant la mère MacFly vous laissent sur votre faim, je peux toujours compléter cette article avec les propos de Joe Alves et Rupert Hitzig au TCL Chinese Theatres d’ Hollywood: « We interviewed her in Los Angeles and weren’t too happy with her » raconte Alves à propos de la belle brune. « Then we went to New York and she comes busting in and she says ‘oh I knew you were back here and I know you didn’t want to see me again,’ and so she left. I said, ‘you know I like that girl. I think she’s great!’ And then you guys (désignant Gottlieb et Hitzig) said ‘well if you really like her…‘ »

leak3A notre ami Rupert Hitzig (un des innombrables producteurs du film) de continuer: »She had rubber flip-flops, she didn’t have shoes. She came out to Universal Studios and Verna Fields who was the head of production at Universal Studios, said ‘why are you bringing girls to Newcastle? We have a lot of ingénues here.’ Lea was 19 years old and Joe saw something that sparkled in her, and I saw some bare feet with some flip-flops so I bought her a pair of shoes. I looked at her one reel and all she had done was a McDonald’s commercial or some commercial, and she got the part and the rest of it is history. » Moralité de toute cette histoire: n’hésitez pas à mentir pour obtenir un boulot.

Publicité Jaws 3-D/Arrivision 3-D

Posted by | Posted in INFOS, PROMO | Posted on 05-09-2013

arrivisionadPetite rareté en provenance des Etats-Unis avec cette publicité à la gloire du tout nouveau système 3D de la firme allemande Arri: le Arrivision 3-d! Ce procédé, en dehors du blockbuster d’ Universal, aura été utilisé sur les tournages du méconnu Rock ‘n Roll Hotel et du très sympathique Amityville 3-d de Richard Fleischer (dont le relief est particulièrement immersif). Dans le cadre du troisième volet des Dents de la mer, deux systèmes auront été successivement utilisés: le Dual lens et le single lens. Le premier ayant été rapidement remplacé… Pour les amoureux de technique, je vais me faire une joie de vous donner les caractéristiques des deux modèles! Ces informations proviennent du numéro spécial 3D du magazine American Cinematographer. J’en ai profité aussi pour vous mettre deux photographies de mauvaises qualités de la bête. La première est minuscule; la seconde est carrément trop sombre… Mais ne m’en voulez pas, ça reste du matériel ultra rare!

 

Arrivision Dual Lens/ Single Lens

Attachment/prime Lens/other: O/O3dscreen_jawsshoot

Complete Arri Camera Package Supplied

Reflex Viewing: Yes/Yes

Shortest Focal length allowed by design: 18mm/ 18mm (50mm prime lens auxilliary retrofocus lenses)

Maximum effective aperture (stop): T/3.5  /  T/.2.5

Continuous F stops: No (prototype) Yes (production) / Yes

Interaxial: 2.68 in.² / 2.95 in.²jnfhvgbfnfg

Closest Convergence: 4 Ft. / 2 Ft.

Closest Focus: 3 to 4 Ft. / 1 Ft.

Image center spacing: 0.366 in. / 0.366 in.

Aspect ratio: 2.35:1 / 2.35:1

Weight: 13 lbs. / 8 lbs.

Size: 10 1/2 x 6 1/2 X 4 1/2 in. / 3,3 X 6.9 X 5.1 in.

Mad Monster « Jaws 3D screening » 13/08/2013

Posted by | Posted in Contact/email, INFOS, SITE NEWS | Posted on 04-09-2013

oealveComme vous vous en doutiez, je n’ai pas eu la chance d’assister à la projection du DCP de Jaws 3D en compagnie de trois des principaux responsables: Joe Alves, Carl Gottlieb et Rupert Hitzig. Déjà, le vol Metz-Hollywood coûte un oeil! Et puis, quand il s’agit d’avion, je rentre en mode Barracuda from the A-Team! Seule solution pour vous tenir au courant de l’actualité Jaws 3D: piller les articles parus sur internet à gauche, à droite (en particulier celui du journaliste Ben Kenber)! C’est peut-être pas très glorieux mais c’est toujours mieux qu’un coup de pied aux fesses! Alors, est-ce que nos trois intervenants se sont montrés bavards? Une chose est sûre, la question de la très mauvaise réception critique de ce troisième volet il y a 30 ans n’a pas été abordée pendant ce Q&A. Mauvais point.

gottlieblichImpossible de parler de ce Jaws 3D sans faire référence au National Lampoon’s JAWS 3 PEOPLE O et Jaws’81… Et c’est Joe Alves qui s’y colle avec un discours parfaitement rodé: « They really didn’t want to make Jaws and we fought to get that made. They tried to stop it four times. Jaws 2, after they fired the first director, they closed it down and Verna Fields and I had to convince Ned Tanen (then President of Universal Studios) that we should go ahead and make it. And then here comes the third one, and they think so much of their biggest movie that they title it Jaws 3, People 0 which means they are making fun of their most successful film. Fields, who later became Vice President of Universal Studios, contacted me and told me that, since Brown and Zanuck left, the rights to Jaws were sold to Alan Landsburg, a television producer best known for the show That’s Incredible and that he was making a mess of everything. Fields asked me to talk with Landsburg which I did, and Landsburg offered me the chance to produce the sequel. But having worked 100 days as a Second Unit Director on Jaws 2 I was far more interested in directing it. But the conversation became very interesting when Landsburg told me of what his plans were for this sequel.
« I said you have to think about making a big shark, » I told Landsburg. « And he said, ‘oh no, no, no, no, no. I just want to use real sharks from what I have from That’s Incredible and mechanical people. So that’s how great the thinking was when this production started. »

rupert« Then, I went to visit various aquatic parks for research and I came across an underwater exhibit that was in 3D (the movie SeaDreams). I thought it was great and loved the depth of the technology that was being used. After exiting the exhibit, I started to think about the possibilities of filming Jaws 3« in 3D.
With Jaws 3-D you accomplish two things. You take the onus off the third because there were very few thirds back then… I think Rocky III was the only one at the time (et Halloween III?). And then you introduce a fresh look at it (the franchise). I went home and did a shark drawing in 3D and I took it to Landsburg and to Sid Sheinberg, and he looked at it and said, ‘can I have this?’ I said ‘Sid, you’re President. You can have whatever you want! I just got to show it to Lew Wasserman first. I got the directing job and that’s how it started. »

rujoePour les questions de scénario, c’est bien évidemment Carl Gottlieb qui s’y est collé. Revenant dans un premier temps sur le script problématique de Richard Matheson, le sympathique Carl (appelé en renfort) s’est surtout attardé sur le tournage en Floride: « When Joe and Rupert came on, they all agreed on me. I had done the other two under difficult circumstances, and they said ‘can you do it again?’ So off I went to Florida and looked at Sea world, surveyed the situation and thought ‘yes I can do the script.' »
Once everything was ready to go, the cast and crew proceeded to Orlando, Florida to film Jaws 3-D… The only food down there was « deep fried, refried or just fried! Making the movie proved to be challenging not only because they were filming in 3D, but also due to the fact that the filmmakers were dealing with water and a big shark ».

paneImpossible donc de parler du film sans rappeler les difficultés inhérentes à la troisième dimension… Joe Alves précise: « We worked with one film and not two cameras. You take and split 35 mm film one way that you have a proportion that is really difficult to compose. A shark is very difficult to get out into the audience because it has a dorsal fin. If you cut the dorsal fin off, you could float it right into the audience. You could take a snake through it, but as soon as something hits that frame it jumps back. So the shark could come out as far as the dorsal fin and that was it. » Des soucis techniques déjà mentionnés par Joe dans la presse de l’époque (fangoria, Starlog)…

signetheIl est toujours question de technique quand le jusqu’à présent très discret Rupert Hitzig prend enfin la parole: « This film was so different because we were so awed by the concept of 3D, but you only see in 3D those frames that work. You don’t see the ones that don’t work. Now there is a point of convergence, and the two lenses of the camera have to be put into convergence. So if I’m focusing on you and you’re in vertical in the back, then I’m focused on you but you’re gonna be two images in the back. Joe had to watch out that there were no verticals in the back because they were going to be too strong. So we go to the motel room in Orlando and we would be watching the movie and going ‘that shot is beautiful’ and ‘oh no!’ Our eyes would go cross eyed or walleyed and we ducked to the floor. Nobody was looking at the performances. So after the third week, I put a sign in the motel room that said « just when you thought it was safe to open your eyes – Jaws 3-D!« 

jawsoledPas particulièrement fan de 3D, Carl Gottlieb se confie: »I haven’t seen it  in 30 years and I’m looking forward to it. Every 3D movie is an experience, and sometimes I like to see them twice: once in 3D to have the stuff whizzing by, and a second time flat so that I can enjoy the story and the performances and everything else without the distractions of shooting for effects. » Notre ami Rupert Hitzig préfère, quant à lui, anticiper la possible déception du public en faisant preuve d’un peu de mauvaise foi quand même (rien sur la politique de Landsburg sur l’ Electronic compositing par exemple): « Remember that its 30 years ago. We didn’t have CGI, we didn’t have video editing and everything was cut on film which was a problem with 3D. I remember in the very beginning, Sid Sheinberg said ‘if you can get the shark to come through the screen and land in the audience’s lap, we’ll all be rich. So try and get that shark (which was so huge) through that little screen. Instead of CGI, we had to composite on videotape and then go back to 3D which was almost an impossible technical stunt. It’s not an apology, it’s just a realization of what you’re going to see. »

jjoealvessignAlves rebondit en partageant une anecdote assez peu connue concernant le journaliste Gene Shalit: « I had talked to him on Jaws 2 and he wanted to know what we were doing on the third one. I was showing him the 3D stuff and was saying if it was a snake I could get it into the audience. A couple of years later I happened to be working on another movie and I saw Gene and he yelled over ‘it should of been a snake! » On sent pointer une légère déception dans les propos du réalisateur… Le mot de la fin appartiendra à Carl Gottlieb: « This script was typed on a typewriter. Fingers on keys, an IBM electric, clickety-clack, clickety-clack. » C’était il y a plus de 30 ans!

jjoesignAucune vidéo de cet échange n’est apparue sur la toile… C’est bien évidemment dommage de passer à côté d’un tel document. La prochaine projection/Q&A de Jaws 3D aura lieu dans quelques jours. Le tout sera filmé dans un but historique. Le président de ce festival 3D m’a assuré qu’il ferait le maximum pour m’obtenir des photographies de l’évènement… Pour la vidéo, c’est mort. Inutile de me demander!

Vivement en tout cas que ce DCP soit disponible sur le territoire français afin que les fans de l’hexagone puissent enfin en profiter! Si vous possédez d’autres photos du 13 aout, n’hésitez pas à me les envoyer à neophyte.punk@gmail.com